Close Free Consultation:
Tap Here to Call Us

Where Colorado Felony Inmate’s Serve Their Time

The courts may only sentence to the DOC offenders who have been convicted of a felony offense. Individuals convicted of misdemeanors may not be sentenced to the DOC.

Custody Classification Levels

All offenders are admitted to the DOC through the Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center, a secure facility that handles inmates of all custody levels. During intake, offenders are given an assessment that is used to determine their custody classification. The classification instrument measures factors such as history of violence, severity of current and prior convictions, substance abuse, stability, and parole eligibility date. Depending on the score in each of these areas, an inmate may be classified according to one of the five custody levels.

DRDC is the first stop for all offenders sentenced to the Department of Corrections. The facility is located on Smith Road, just east of the Denver County Jail. Staff at the 480 bed maximum security facility process, test, and classify offenders entering the system, prior to their placement at one of the Department’s permanent facilities. Offenders are given a complete diagnostic evaluation including medical, dental, mental health assessment, and personal needs assessments, as well as academic and vocational testing, initial classification, and a custody level recommendation. The facility also houses a 36 bed Infirmar

Inmate Custody Classification Levels Administrative Segregation

For offenders who require maximum security because they:

  • have behaved in ways that demonstrate they cannot function appropriately in a less secure general population setting; and/or
  • are extremely difficult to manage in a general population setting.
Close

For offenders convicted of serious violent crimes and who:

  • require close supervision;
  • exhibit a high degree of institutional adjustment problems;
  • are a high escape risk; and/or
  • need close supervision based on their parole eligibility date.
Medium

For offenders convicted of violent and non-violent offenses and who:

  • need a moderate level of supervision;
  • exhibit moderate institutional adjustment problems;
  • are a low to moderate escape risk; and/or
  • have high medical or mental health needs.
Restrictive-Minimum

For offenders convicted of non-violent offenses and who:

  • exhibit very low to no institutional adjustment problems;
  • are a low escape risk;
  • have a parole eligibility date of less than five years; and
  • have low to moderate medical and mental health needs.
Minimum

For offenders convicted of non-violent offenses and who:

  • exhibit no institutional adjustment problems;
  • are not an escape risk;
  • have a parole eligibility date of less than three years; and
  • have minimal or no medical or mental health needs
Facility Security Levels

An offender’s custody classification determines his or her facility placement. The DOC places

inmates according to their assessed custody level in an appropriate facility based on its security level.

Prior to May 24, 2000, an inmate was placed in a facility according to his or her assessed classification level, which matched the facility’s custody classification level. After May 24, 2000, each facility was designated a security level that was defined in statute.

The following paragraphs describe the main external and internal measures differentiating the five security levels of prison facilities in Colorado, from the highest to lowest levels.

Correctional Facility Security Levels – External Measures Internal Measures Level V
  • Double perimeter fencing with razor wire and detection devices
  • Towers or stun-lethal fencing
  • Continuous patrol of perimeter
  • Sally ports (double gates to closely monitor the movement to and from a restricted area)
  • Housing in cells with bars on all openings and with sally-port doors to outside operated by a control center
  • Remote controlled sliding and lockable cell doors
Level IV
  • Double perimeter fencing and/or razor wire with detection devices
  • Towers
  • Continuous patrol of perimeter
  • Housing in cells with bars on all openings
  • Remote controlled hinged or sliding cell doors that are lockable from the control area
Level III
  • Wall and/or double perimeter fencing with razor wire and detection devices
  • Towers
  • Continuous patrol of perimeter
  • Housing in cells, rooms, or dormitories with bars on window openings
  • Hinged lockable cell doors
Level II
  • Designated boundaries with single or double perimeter fencing
  • Periodic patrol of perimeter
  • Housing in modular units, cells, or dormitories
  • Hinged cell doors with lockable exterior doors
Level I
  • Designated boundaries
  • Housing in individual rooms or dormitories
  • Non-security cell doors with lockable exterior doors
Colorado Corrections Facilities and The Security Levels
  • Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility – Level III
  • Buena Vista Correctional Complex – Level III
  • Fremont Correctional Facility – Level III
  • Delta Correctional Center – Level I
  • Skyline Correctional Center – Level I
  • Colorado Women’s Correctional – Facility Level V
  • Colorado Correctional Center – Level I
  • Rifle Correctional Center – Level I
  • Centennial Correctional Facility – Level IV
  • Four Mile Correctional Center – Level II
  • Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility – Level III
  • Arrowhead Correctional Center – Level II
  • Colorado Correctional Alternative Program – Level I
  • Limon Correctional Facility – Level IV
  • Denver Reception and Diagnostic Center – Level V
  • Colorado State Penitentiary – Level V
  • Pueblo Minimum Center – Level II
  • Youthful Offender System – Adult Males – Level II
  • San Carlos Correctional Facility – Level V
  • Denver Women’s Correctional Facility – Level V
  • Sterling Correctional Facility – Level V
  • Ft. Lyon Correctional Facility – Level III
  • Trinidad Correctional Facility – Level II

Practice Areas
Client Reviews
★★★★★
"Mr. Steinberg provided my family with expert handling of my son's case. He took extra time understand the case, to consult with us during the pretrial proceedings, and to support him for a plea agreement. Mr. Steinberg is very knowledge about the law and very professional. He guided us in achieving the best possible outcome for my son. If I am ever in need of law services again, I will certainly have Mr. Steinberg handle my case. l also highly recommend his services to anyone that might be in need of an excellent defense attorney!" Tanya Witt
★★★★★
"I found myself in criminal trouble, that I wasn't guilty of and thanks to Mr. Steinberg's dedication and hard work, right before we we're looking at having to continue on to trial level Mr. Steinberg was able to use his vast knowledge of the law and his many respected years in the system to find a way to show my innocence. After a very unsure and somewhat difficult time for me, this very skilled and knowledgeable attorney was able to find the right path to take to reach a dismissal in my case. For that I can't tell you how much I appreciate his representation and his excellent understanding and helpful personality. He's a great man and an even better attorney but don't misunderstand him, he is an attorney not a therapist. Thanks H." Josh
★★★★★
"Working with Michael Steinberg was a wonderful experience. Truly people need to know that he is a expert in what he does. His personality is compassionate, intellectual, and down to earth. I glean that Michael is fun to be around. In the time I worked with him, it was a pleasure to be around him. As for my case, the outcome was amazing and couldn’t be better. He has made my life more manageable because of the outcome of my case. I’ve worked with other lawyers in the Denver area. He is superior to them all. If you’re in need of a lawyer and you come across Mr. Steinberg look no further he’s going to be the one you need. Thank you again Michael." Renee Taylor
★★★★★
Mr. Steinberg, It has been an honor working with you. I very much appreciated your style, demeanor, patience, and determination. I was well instructed in every step of the court process, and I felt that I received excellent guidance and timely information regarding my case. You have been extremely thoughtful with your time, and I was very impressed with your sensitivity in responding to my requests. Thank you. Anonymous
Contact Us